Difference between revisions of "User talk:Mozi"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Brilliant fucking work on the Syndicate Items page. We'll have to use that template as a layout for the rest of the headings, and eventually get rid of that ugly Items page c...") |
(→How do i be as pro as you at wiki things: new section) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Brilliant fucking work on the Syndicate Items page. We'll have to use that template as a layout for the rest of the headings, and eventually get rid of that ugly Items page completely. --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 09:51, 1 October 2012 (CDT) | Brilliant fucking work on the Syndicate Items page. We'll have to use that template as a layout for the rest of the headings, and eventually get rid of that ugly Items page completely. --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 09:51, 1 October 2012 (CDT) | ||
* Just as a note, I like the cost on normal things if they can be built by autolathes. If they can't we can just say 'unbuildable', which is also interesting information. As far as having things in one or two places, I think your gut is good in that such a thing barely matters. As long as it's consistent, correct, and available where you would expect it to be, who cares if it's in two places? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 13:54, 1 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
== How do i be as pro as you at wiki things == | |||
--[[User:Conor12|Conor12]] ([[User talk:Conor12|talk]]) 14:33, 25 October 2012 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 19:33, 25 October 2012
Brilliant fucking work on the Syndicate Items page. We'll have to use that template as a layout for the rest of the headings, and eventually get rid of that ugly Items page completely. --Coolguye (talk) 09:51, 1 October 2012 (CDT)
- Just as a note, I like the cost on normal things if they can be built by autolathes. If they can't we can just say 'unbuildable', which is also interesting information. As far as having things in one or two places, I think your gut is good in that such a thing barely matters. As long as it's consistent, correct, and available where you would expect it to be, who cares if it's in two places? --Coolguye (talk) 13:54, 1 October 2012 (CDT)