Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cogmap2"
Somepotato (talk | contribs) |
Noah Buttes (talk | contribs) (→Tabs: new section) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If you're going to work on this page, please make it in the style of [[Cogmap1]]. <del>I'll merge Cogmap with Cogmap1 when I get some more free time.</del><sup>(finished)</sup> Thanks! | If you're going to work on this page, please make it in the style of [[Cogmap1]]. <del>I'll merge Cogmap with Cogmap1 when I get some more free time.</del><sup>(finished)</sup> Thanks! | ||
[[User:Somepotato|Somepotato]] ([[User talk:Somepotato|talk]]) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (PST) | [[User:Somepotato|Somepotato]] ([[User talk:Somepotato|talk]]) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (PST) | ||
== Standardization of Terms == | |||
We need to standardize how we refer to parts of Cogmap2 on the wiki. | |||
For example, on the [[Destiny]] page I use ship terms such as '''Aft, Port, Bow, and Starboard''' to describe directions since it's a ship. | |||
However on Cogmap2, I think it should be referred to as a station since there are no engines. The current layout seems to designate the bridge as the '''stern'''... and the pod bay on the '''aft''' side. '''THESE ARE THE SAME WORD FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES.''' | |||
''(Aft means towards the back and Stern means literally the back if you want to get picky)''. So currently, there is '''no cohesive naming system''' set up for Cogmap2 nor any other general pages on the wiki. | |||
I propose we switch to a simpler system that people would more easily interpret, the system being '''North, East, South, and West'''. --[[User:Zewaka|Zewaka]] ([[User talk:Zewaka|talk]]) 23:17, 18 February 2016 (GMT) | |||
I'd also prefer that cardinal directions are used as most people know them. --[[User:Conor12|Conor12]] ([[User talk:Conor12|talk]]) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (GMT) | |||
Afaik its just Destiny that uses the ship direction names because its an RP map, the others are safe to use NSEW with. --[[User:Somepotato|Somepotato]] ([[User talk:Somepotato|talk]]) 02:59, 22 February 2016 (GMT) | |||
Okay, I'll just go ahead with fixing the directions in Cogmap2. Yay for standardization! [[User:Zewaka|Zewaka]] ([[User talk:Zewaka|talk]]) 08:35, 27 February 2016 (GMT) | |||
== Tabs == | |||
Should we use tabs to merge all the area listing pages into one page? | |||
We'd obviously need a new namespace, too.--[[User:Noah Buttes|Noah Buttes]] ([[User talk:Noah Buttes|talk]]) 21:33, 7 May 2017 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:33, 7 May 2017
If you're going to work on this page, please make it in the style of Cogmap1. I'll merge Cogmap with Cogmap1 when I get some more free time.(finished) Thanks!
Somepotato (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (PST)
Standardization of Terms
We need to standardize how we refer to parts of Cogmap2 on the wiki. For example, on the Destiny page I use ship terms such as Aft, Port, Bow, and Starboard to describe directions since it's a ship.
However on Cogmap2, I think it should be referred to as a station since there are no engines. The current layout seems to designate the bridge as the stern... and the pod bay on the aft side. THESE ARE THE SAME WORD FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES.
(Aft means towards the back and Stern means literally the back if you want to get picky). So currently, there is no cohesive naming system set up for Cogmap2 nor any other general pages on the wiki.
I propose we switch to a simpler system that people would more easily interpret, the system being North, East, South, and West. --Zewaka (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2016 (GMT)
I'd also prefer that cardinal directions are used as most people know them. --Conor12 (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (GMT)
Afaik its just Destiny that uses the ship direction names because its an RP map, the others are safe to use NSEW with. --Somepotato (talk) 02:59, 22 February 2016 (GMT)
Okay, I'll just go ahead with fixing the directions in Cogmap2. Yay for standardization! Zewaka (talk) 08:35, 27 February 2016 (GMT)
Tabs
Should we use tabs to merge all the area listing pages into one page?
We'd obviously need a new namespace, too.--Noah Buttes (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2017 (GMT)