Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pubbie Tears"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
So I'm thinking of reverting Coolguye's edits on this page and the other one since he seems to have arbitrarily decided that it should be gutted. If people actually like it better this way then chime in and I'll leave it alone. --[[User:Dauntasa|Dauntasa]] ([[User talk:Dauntasa|talk]]) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | So I'm thinking of reverting Coolguye's edits on this page and the other one since he seems to have arbitrarily decided that it should be gutted. If people actually like it better this way then chime in and I'll leave it alone. --[[User:Dauntasa|Dauntasa]] ([[User talk:Dauntasa|talk]]) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | ||
* Specifically which omissions do you want to put back in? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 09:40, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | * Specifically which omissions do you want to put back in? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 09:40, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | ||
I honestly don't see the point in selectively removing anything. It's all pretty fucking similar so I'd say keep it all if people find it funny or cut the whole thing if nobody does.-- [[User:Dauntasa|Dauntasa]] ([[User talk:Dauntasa|talk]]) 12:27, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:27, 4 October 2012
I love how all the other stuff was lost irrevocably in many cases, but we kept this shit. --Hotelbravolima (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- I would personally be in favor of getting rid of all this shit completely, it's circlejerky in-joke bullshit that stopped being funny roughly 20 seconds after its creation. If you want to have a pubbie tears page that's fine, but let's have funny griefing stories that anyone can enjoy. --Coolguye (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Less dumb pubbies, more funny stories. --Doctordoodler (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
So I'm thinking of reverting Coolguye's edits on this page and the other one since he seems to have arbitrarily decided that it should be gutted. If people actually like it better this way then chime in and I'll leave it alone. --Dauntasa (talk) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (CDT)
- Specifically which omissions do you want to put back in? --Coolguye (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2012 (CDT)
I honestly don't see the point in selectively removing anything. It's all pretty fucking similar so I'd say keep it all if people find it funny or cut the whole thing if nobody does.-- Dauntasa (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2012 (CDT)