Difference between revisions of "User talk:Katznelson"
(Created page with "I tried to stress in the Low Priority section that not everything deserves brig time, but if you came away with this impression then chances are good that someone else has, to...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I tried to stress in the Low Priority section that not everything deserves brig time, but if you came away with this impression then chances are good that someone else has, too. I dislike the idea of putting in a 'very low' section because that article is already long in the tooth and if anything it should be shorter, not longer. What would you think about an obvious sub-bullet that breaks out the stress that's already there into a really obvious statement? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 17:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | I tried to stress in the Low Priority section that not everything deserves brig time, but if you came away with this impression then chances are good that someone else has, too. I dislike the idea of putting in a 'very low' section because that article is already long in the tooth and if anything it should be shorter, not longer. What would you think about an obvious sub-bullet that breaks out the stress that's already there into a really obvious statement? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 17:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
yo if you're trying to mark something for deletion, please use { {delete|im a big dork} } instead of { { clean up } } , it'd be much easier for me if we had the pages marked for deletion under one page, instead of severals, thanks! (without the spaces between the squirly stuff of course) --[[User:Nitrous|Nitrous]] ([[User talk:Nitrous|talk]]) 08:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:27, 13 August 2013
I tried to stress in the Low Priority section that not everything deserves brig time, but if you came away with this impression then chances are good that someone else has, too. I dislike the idea of putting in a 'very low' section because that article is already long in the tooth and if anything it should be shorter, not longer. What would you think about an obvious sub-bullet that breaks out the stress that's already there into a really obvious statement? --Coolguye (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)
yo if you're trying to mark something for deletion, please use { {delete|im a big dork} } instead of { { clean up } } , it'd be much easier for me if we had the pages marked for deletion under one page, instead of severals, thanks! (without the spaces between the squirly stuff of course) --Nitrous (talk) 08:27, 13 August 2013 (UTC)