Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pubbie Tears"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
* I would personally be in favor of getting rid of all this shit completely, it's circlejerky in-joke bullshit that stopped being funny roughly 20 seconds after its creation. If you want to have a pubbie tears page that's fine, but let's have funny griefing stories that anyone can enjoy. --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 15:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | * I would personally be in favor of getting rid of all this shit completely, it's circlejerky in-joke bullshit that stopped being funny roughly 20 seconds after its creation. If you want to have a pubbie tears page that's fine, but let's have funny griefing stories that anyone can enjoy. --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 15:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
**Less dumb pubbies, more funny stories. --[[User:Doctordoodler|Doctordoodler]] ([[User talk:Doctordoodler|talk]]) 15:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | **Less dumb pubbies, more funny stories. --[[User:Doctordoodler|Doctordoodler]] ([[User talk:Doctordoodler|talk]]) 15:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
So I'm thinking of reverting Coolguye's edits on this page and the other one since he seems to have arbitrarily decided that it should be gutted. If people actually like it better this way then chime in and I'll leave it alone. --[[User:Dauntasa|Dauntasa]] ([[User talk:Dauntasa|talk]]) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
* Specifically which omissions do you want to put back in? --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 09:40, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
I honestly don't see the point in selectively removing anything. It's all pretty fucking similar so I'd say keep it all if people find it funny or cut the whole thing if nobody does.-- [[User:Dauntasa|Dauntasa]] ([[User talk:Dauntasa|talk]]) 12:27, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
* Your note about it all being pretty similar is exactly why a lot of people I've spoken to, particularly in IRC, dislike the way it's set up right now. I don't see the point of having an entry that is nothing more than 'admin can i have telekinesis' when we have a [[Pubbie_Tears#Maizo123.2FIshiro1_10_June_2010|great chatlog]] of what happens when people ask and why it's dumb to do so. Ostaf's voiced concern about it was that there was a number of stories in there that weren't really tears nor dumb, just sort of shoved in so people could have their name on the pubbie ownzone article. Rats808's log is a perfect example of that, I think. The pubbie there had no tears and wasn't really that dumb when compared to the peabrained morons he's alongside, it was just a bunch of regulars doling out weak burns so they could be included. I don't feel what I've done so far is ideal, but I think it's definitely an improvement to not have to read through humdrum stuff like ''hahahaha idiot griefer when you shoted me i not died'' to get to the absolute fucking gem that is ''you want to hear fantisie janet jakson 2 dolphines and a steam roller'' --[[User:Coolguye|Coolguye]] ([[User talk:Coolguye|talk]]) 12:44, 4 October 2012 (CDT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:44, 4 October 2012
I love how all the other stuff was lost irrevocably in many cases, but we kept this shit. --Hotelbravolima (talk) 09:18, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- I would personally be in favor of getting rid of all this shit completely, it's circlejerky in-joke bullshit that stopped being funny roughly 20 seconds after its creation. If you want to have a pubbie tears page that's fine, but let's have funny griefing stories that anyone can enjoy. --Coolguye (talk) 15:25, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Less dumb pubbies, more funny stories. --Doctordoodler (talk) 15:43, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
So I'm thinking of reverting Coolguye's edits on this page and the other one since he seems to have arbitrarily decided that it should be gutted. If people actually like it better this way then chime in and I'll leave it alone. --Dauntasa (talk) 06:59, 4 October 2012 (CDT)
- Specifically which omissions do you want to put back in? --Coolguye (talk) 09:40, 4 October 2012 (CDT)
I honestly don't see the point in selectively removing anything. It's all pretty fucking similar so I'd say keep it all if people find it funny or cut the whole thing if nobody does.-- Dauntasa (talk) 12:27, 4 October 2012 (CDT)
- Your note about it all being pretty similar is exactly why a lot of people I've spoken to, particularly in IRC, dislike the way it's set up right now. I don't see the point of having an entry that is nothing more than 'admin can i have telekinesis' when we have a great chatlog of what happens when people ask and why it's dumb to do so. Ostaf's voiced concern about it was that there was a number of stories in there that weren't really tears nor dumb, just sort of shoved in so people could have their name on the pubbie ownzone article. Rats808's log is a perfect example of that, I think. The pubbie there had no tears and wasn't really that dumb when compared to the peabrained morons he's alongside, it was just a bunch of regulars doling out weak burns so they could be included. I don't feel what I've done so far is ideal, but I think it's definitely an improvement to not have to read through humdrum stuff like hahahaha idiot griefer when you shoted me i not died to get to the absolute fucking gem that is you want to hear fantisie janet jakson 2 dolphines and a steam roller --Coolguye (talk) 12:44, 4 October 2012 (CDT)