Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cogmap2/Ore Processing"
Noah Buttes (talk | contribs) |
Noah Buttes (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
--[[User:Noah Buttes|Noah Buttes]] ([[User talk:Noah Buttes|talk]]) 22:54, 13 June 2016 (GMT) | --[[User:Noah Buttes|Noah Buttes]] ([[User talk:Noah Buttes|talk]]) 22:54, 13 June 2016 (GMT) | ||
Edit: shear, compressive, and tensile strength are incredibly out of whack. | |||
--[[User:Noah Buttes|Noah Buttes]] ([[User talk:Noah Buttes|talk]]) 23:28, 13 June 2016 (GMT) |
Revision as of 23:28, 13 June 2016
We really need to clean this up and update it.
Really, the wiki as a whole needs to be updated to an extent, but we have to start somewhere.
--Noah Buttes (talk) 20:02, 12 June 2016 (GMT)
Material Recombulator is wrong, it's now used for a somewhat defunct material research. In-fact I think the material computer is downright broken. Everything in the "oh god what are these numbers" is correct, there has been no new properties and while the properties values may have gotten change the description for them is still the same.
The workbench really doesn't have alot going for it, so yeah, that section is up to date.
Everything else is just general suggestions, which seem up to date, skimming through it.
--Sundance
Actually, the oh god, what are all these numbers page is definitely not correct. Dielectric strength isn't used to calculate insulation effectiveness anywhere.
It's typically Electrical conductivity instead. For instance, the siemens coefficient of clothing (which determines whether you get shocked or not) is determined with this calculation: siemens_coefficient = material.hasProperty(PROP_ELECTRICAL) ? material.getProperty(PROP_ELECTRICAL) / 100 : siemens_coefficient
I don't have the time to check the rest right now.
--Noah Buttes (talk) 22:54, 13 June 2016 (GMT)
Edit: shear, compressive, and tensile strength are incredibly out of whack.
--Noah Buttes (talk) 23:28, 13 June 2016 (GMT)