Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Construct"
Convair880 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Sorry, I'm not a fan of this idea. They use more templates on the /tg/ wiki, yes, but that doesn't necessarily make it worth copying or the better solution. To me, their const...") |
m (Pre-delete tagging discussion; please pipe in if you're for or against deleting it) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Sorry, I'm not a fan of this idea. They use more templates on the /tg/ wiki, yes, but that doesn't necessarily make it worth copying or the better solution. To me, their construction page is a mess of bright colors, upscaled 32px sprites, uneven presentation and everything is much larger and more picture-heavy than it needs to be in general. They even spun off half the content into a second page because the templates need so much space. The info on our page is compact and to-the-point, and you can just click the links if you want to learn more about certain components and where to get them from. I'd very much prefer this style of presentation whenever I have to look up something. Well, and it's designed in such a way that duplicate info and sprites are avoided if at all possible considering we have pretty much only one consistent (that is long-term) and active contributor. --[[User:Convair880|Convair880]] ([[User talk:Convair880|talk]]) 06:45, 3 November 2015 (PST) | Sorry, I'm not a fan of this idea. They use more templates on the /tg/ wiki, yes, but that doesn't necessarily make it worth copying or the better solution. To me, their construction page is a mess of bright colors, upscaled 32px sprites, uneven presentation and everything is much larger and more picture-heavy than it needs to be in general. They even spun off half the content into a second page because the templates need so much space. The info on our page is compact and to-the-point, and you can just click the links if you want to learn more about certain components and where to get them from. I'd very much prefer this style of presentation whenever I have to look up something. Well, and it's designed in such a way that duplicate info and sprites are avoided if at all possible considering we have pretty much only one consistent (that is long-term) and active contributor. --[[User:Convair880|Convair880]] ([[User talk:Convair880|talk]]) 06:45, 3 November 2015 (PST) | ||
What do people think about this page currently? Should it be used on the Construction pages or deleted? [[User:SaccharineChampion|SaccharineChampion]] ([[User talk:SaccharineChampion|talk]]) 17:55, 4 February 2020 (GMT) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:55, 4 February 2020
Sorry, I'm not a fan of this idea. They use more templates on the /tg/ wiki, yes, but that doesn't necessarily make it worth copying or the better solution. To me, their construction page is a mess of bright colors, upscaled 32px sprites, uneven presentation and everything is much larger and more picture-heavy than it needs to be in general. They even spun off half the content into a second page because the templates need so much space. The info on our page is compact and to-the-point, and you can just click the links if you want to learn more about certain components and where to get them from. I'd very much prefer this style of presentation whenever I have to look up something. Well, and it's designed in such a way that duplicate info and sprites are avoided if at all possible considering we have pretty much only one consistent (that is long-term) and active contributor. --Convair880 (talk) 06:45, 3 November 2015 (PST)
What do people think about this page currently? Should it be used on the Construction pages or deleted? SaccharineChampion (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2020 (GMT)