Difference between revisions of "Talk:Cogmap2"
m (signed) |
|||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I propose we switch to a simpler system that people would more easily interpret, the system being '''North, East, South, and West'''. --[[User:Zewaka|Zewaka]] ([[User talk:Zewaka|talk]]) 23:17, 18 February 2016 (GMT) | I propose we switch to a simpler system that people would more easily interpret, the system being '''North, East, South, and West'''. --[[User:Zewaka|Zewaka]] ([[User talk:Zewaka|talk]]) 23:17, 18 February 2016 (GMT) | ||
I'd also prefer that cardinal directions are used as most people know them. --[[User:Conor12|Conor12]] ([[User talk:Conor12|talk]]) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (GMT) | |||
Revision as of 06:31, 20 February 2016
If you're going to work on this page, please make it in the style of Cogmap1. I'll merge Cogmap with Cogmap1 when I get some more free time.(finished) Thanks!
Somepotato (talk) 17:16, 13 December 2015 (PST)
Standardization of Terms
We need to standardize how we refer to parts of Cogmap2 on the wiki. For example, on the Destiny page I use ship terms such as Aft, Port, Bow, and Starboard to describe directions since it's a ship.
However on Cogmap2, I think it should be referred to as a station since there are no engines. The current layout seems to designate the bridge as the stern... and the pod bay on the aft side. THESE ARE THE SAME WORD FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES.
(Aft means towards the back and Stern means literally the back if you want to get picky). So currently, there is no cohesive naming system set up for Cogmap2 nor any other general pages on the wiki.
I propose we switch to a simpler system that people would more easily interpret, the system being North, East, South, and West. --Zewaka (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2016 (GMT)
I'd also prefer that cardinal directions are used as most people know them. --Conor12 (talk) 06:31, 20 February 2016 (GMT)